- #CAPTURING REALITY MERGE PHOTO POINT CLOUD HOW TO#
- #CAPTURING REALITY MERGE PHOTO POINT CLOUD WINDOWS 10#
- #CAPTURING REALITY MERGE PHOTO POINT CLOUD TRIAL#
When you open a project it shows you the first component, which may only contain a small number of images and thus not show much. By default after the alignment it shows you the component with the highest number of aligned images.
I had this when after my first model, but realised that it if not all of the images align into a single model you will get multiple components. When I reloaded it, the mesh, texture and the photo alignments were gone, even though there's a large set of data files associated with the project. If anyone else does some testing, please send some feedback.
#CAPTURING REALITY MERGE PHOTO POINT CLOUD HOW TO#
It seems a little difficult to figure out what is really going on and how to make sure of the quality of the results. A little more black box than I would like.
#CAPTURING REALITY MERGE PHOTO POINT CLOUD TRIAL#
I hope to do more testing before the end of the trial period but there never seems to be enough time. It will also be interesting to see if RC becomes available on something other than Windows and without the CUDA requirement. Of course PhotoScan is available and runs well on Macs which is a big deal for me. It will be interesting once they announce pricing. I am not sure it is better than what is already available but it is too early to tell. I would be very interested in any testing that others might do. Meshing of course will always be faster if CUDA is available and RC may very well be faster at meshing than PhotoScan and others but I cannot test that currently. I of course am a stickler for the highest quality camera calibration as that is the single biggest source of error for a photogrammetry solution. The camera calibration will never be as good as is possible on High. With that speed of course there is a compromise. If you do an alignment using PhotoScan at Medium or Low I believe you will see nearly the same speed increase. At least half the original size, perhaps even more. I believe that by default the alignment is done using down sampled images. However, learning how good the alignment and subsequent camera calibration is really my biggest curiosity/concern.Įveryone seems to think that RC is faster for alignment but I am not so certain.
#CAPTURING REALITY MERGE PHOTO POINT CLOUD WINDOWS 10#
Unfortunately I can only currently test it using Windows 10 in a Parallels virtual environment so I have not tested anything beyond alignment. I have been testing Reality Capture just a bit.
0 kommentar(er)
